Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the part as it could look like in reality after manufacturing. Figure 2. Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 show how the component shown in Figure 2 can be measured. Surprisingly you have three different results with the same part. How can it be that all three figures are correct? Figure 3. Figure 4. In Figure 3 the part is aligned to the long side. In Figure 4 the part is aligned to the short side.
In Figure 5 the part is aligned to best fit. He uses notes as Parker did rather than symbols. I haven't yet checked this against Y I suspect, though, that this was the case; even the later MIL-STD-8C of which I have checked does not treat datums systematically as the basis for dimensioning. I haven't really researched this period yet. Sources I've found but not yet examined include:. David H. As noted in the bibliography, it is basically a close technical report on the different interpretations of individual types of features.
It is useful also because it associates clearly the contemporary s, s use of the terms "datum dimensioning," "true position dimensioning," and "geometric dimensioning and tolerancing" with each other. It would have been more useful still if it had contained any bibliographic information at all on the various standards it referenced. Foster was a relatively early US entrant into this field who continued to publish commercially for some time.
The "Acknowledgments" sections of his works contain a number of interesting references to the literature of the s and s, not all of which have been tracked down here.
Krulikowski's Fundamentals of Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing is one of the few texts of the last quarter century to devote more than an obligatory bullet point to the history of this field. Some of this information duplicates that given elsewhere in this Notebook. I find it handy to have a reference all in one place, though. ORD Few Sources Despite its importance, our knowledge of the origins of geometric methods in dimensioning and tolerancing is most unsatisfactory.
Rolt It is through F. Stanley Parker We know very little about Stanley Parker, yet it would seem that we owe an entire field of modern industry to him - and, moreover, a field which stands behind almost every aspect of modern industry. Parker's methods were used "for the re-dimensioning and tolerancing of the drawings of a particular naval weapon to facilitate its increased production by a number of new contractors" p.
Parker was awarded the British Empire Medal B. Parker was given "a substantial monetary award" by the British Admiralty in p. Parker says of himself: "This book contains many criticisms of the faults of drawings of the past. Early Work in England: to The early work on geometric methods in dimensioning and tolerancing is centered about Stanley Parker and various committees of the British Admiralty.
Rolt continues: "These manuals [ Data Sheets for Designers and Draughtsmen ] were later used as a foundation for the work of an Inter-Services Committee [The Inter-Services Committee for Dimensioning and Tolerancing of Drawings], set up by the Ministry of Production late in for establishing a basic system for dimensioning and tolerancing the drawings of interchangeable engineering products of various degrees of precision.
It is interesting to note that while the revision of British Standard , Drawing Office Practices , says almost nothing about tolerancing it merely states in one paragraph that when necessary maximum and minimum limit dimensions can be given together , it provides this explanation in its foreword: "The difficult subjects of tolerancing, the application of limits and fits, and grades of surface finish have merited the attention of special Technical Committees and separate publications will be issued in due course relating to these matters.
Rolt says of the transition to peacetime needs: By this time [] Service [that is, Admiralty, etc. Parker's "Drawings and Dimensions" Stanley Parker's work culminated in two documents: the revision of B. Other Anglophone References in the s Beyond B. Anglophone References in the s I haven't really researched this period yet.
Historical Studies There aren't many. What are the 3 types of tolerances? Three basic tolerances that occur most often on working drawings are: limit dimensions, unilateral, and bilateral tolerances. Limit dimensions are two dimensional values stacked on top of each other. It means "regardless of size" In your callout you have. How is flatness measured? Flatness is can be measured using a height gauge run across the surface of the part if only the reference feature is held parallel.
You are trying making sure that any point along the surface does not go above or below the tolerance zone. What is form tolerance? This is done by considering SLOF when creating the design, and by applying geometric controls to the drawing. What is SLOF? There are four components to making sure that your drawing indicates the geometric and size requirements of each feature. These four requirements are known as SLOF: size, location, orientation, and form. Size refers to the physical size of a feature.
Location is the location of the feature in 3D space, relative to other features. Most commonly Position is used for this type of control.
Orientation is how your part is angled, or oriented in 3D space, relative to other features.
0コメント